I remember when doing this process with my wife. During the halfway point we brought all sorts of documentation to show commingling of assets and showing we had “built a life together” .. we get to the interview and they just ask if we have a Costco card together. :|
good luck to you!
pass
on my machine:
@abucci@anthony.buc.ci So.. The issue is that its showing the password by default? Would making an alias to always include the -c help? We can probably engage Jason with a PR to enable a more hardened approach when desired. I’ve spoken to him before and is generally a pretty open to ideas.
I found this app that was created by the gopass author that does copy by default and has a tui or GUI mode https://github.com/cortex/ripasso
@mckinley@twtxt.net i use pass along with the android and browser-pass clients. it is very good and keeping in sync is pretty simple.
@mckinley@twtxt.net very weird things going on for me.. i can see your twt but its not showing up as a reply or fork?
i am curious why I only get 5 twts in yarn when they have several more on the feed. so something isnt parsing right.
@abucci@anthony.buc.ci i have an old copy of the 2005 version from university if you want to give it a read through. its quite dry.
i have one box with virmach that is something like 3 vcpu 5.88g ram and 15g disk. for $29/year.
!XO!1GcUL/ZbHj+CZnedB67ddd0tt3y1ppSLY7wbzMhraUeubCUH8LRT61pz6jPyOEa2wYYupwP7tu1cwR9mNN/k+No7PEw13kqBy6YvDU8jettw25Lkj3gZ+R4J1q6d0GWKKGx+OsYmJMPev7BL+5SCnt08qQYmgGAVhyhJZMkndIgk=!OX!
@prologic@twtxt.net yap. This was an offer message to you. rachet-over-yarn
mode enabled!
@prologic@twtxt.net vultr pricing is low. But it can be lower if you shop the less fancy admin ui sites like virmarch or ovh. There are some bare metal that cost way less.. Though the experience is less than optimal.
@abucci@anthony.buc.ci ISO 27001 is basically the same. It means that there is management sign off for a process to improve security is in place. Not that the system is secure. And ITIL is that managment signs off that problems and incidents should have processes defined.
Though its a good mess of words you can throw around while saying “management supports this so X needs to get done”
@prologic@twtxt.net !XO!1GcUL/ZbHj+CZnedB67ddd0tt3y1ppSLY7wbzMhraUeubCUH8LRT61pz6jPyOEa2wYYupwP7tu1cwR9mNN/k+No7PEw13kqBy6YvDU8jettw25Lkj3gZ+R4J1q6d0GWKKGx+OsYmJMPev7BL+5SCnt08qQYmgGAVhyhJZMkndIgk=!OX!
@prologic@twtxt.net that worked.. But took crazy long time
@prologic@twtxt.net test
@prologic@twtxt.net I get this error when replying to yarns.
@prologic@twtxt.net I have updated to kinda follow this. It now redirects to other webfingers if the resource has a different hostname. I’m still not sure what I should put multiple services with the same domain name. Like if they were to have conflicting properties.
it seems they are following the URN format of a URI where you just prefix things with colons.
urn:example:apple:pear:plum:cherry
@abucci@anthony.buc.ci see here in the okta docs: https://developer.okta.com/docs/reference/api/webfinger/ they are adding a prefix to the acct
so in effect it would look something like this:
---
subject: acct:me@sour.is
aliases:
- salty:me@sour.is
- yarn:xuu@ev.sour.is
- status:xuu@chaos.social
- mailto:me@sour.is
---
subject: salty:me@sour.is
aliases:
- acct:me@sour.is
links:
- rel: self
type: application/json+salty
href: https://ev.sour.is/inbox/01GAEMKXYJ4857JQP1MJGD61Z5
properties:
"http://salty.im/ns/nick": xuu
"http://salty.im/ns/display": Jon Lundy
"http://salty.im/ns/pubkey": kex140fwaena9t0mrgnjeare5zuknmmvl0vc7agqy5yr938vusxfh9ys34vd2p
---
subject: yarn:xuu@ev.sour.is
links:
- rel: https://txt.sour.is/user/xuu
properties:
"https://sour.is/rel/redirect": https://txt.sour.is/.well-known/webfinger?resource=acct%3Axuu%40txt.sour.is
---
subject: status:xuu@chaos.social
links:
- rel: http://joinmastodon.org#xuu%40chaos.social
properties:
"https://sour.is/rel/redirect": https://chaos.social/.well-known/webfinger?resource=acct%3Axuu%40chaos.social
---
subject: mailto:me@sour.is
...
@prologic@twtxt.net Unfortunately the RFC’s are a bit light in this regard. While it makes mention of different kinds of accounts like mailto: or status services.. it never combines them. It does make mention of using redirects to forward a request to other webfingers to provide additional detail.
I am kinda partial to using salty:acct:me@sour.is, yarn:acct:xuu@txt.sour.is, mailto:me@sour.is that could redirect to a specific service. and a parent account acct:me@sour.is that would reference them in some way. either in properties or aliases.
@prologic@twtxt.net That was exactly my thought at first too. but what do we put as the rel
for salty account? since it is decentralized we dont have a set URL for machines to key off. so for example take the standard response from okta:
# http GET https://example.okta.com/.well-known/webfinger resource==acct:bob
{
"links": [
{
"href": "https://example.okta.com/sso/idps/OKTA?login_hint=bob#",
"properties": {
"okta:idp:type": "OKTA"
},
"rel": "http://openid.net/specs/connect/1.0/issuer",
"titles": {
"und": "example"
}
}
],
"subject": "acct:bob"
}
It gives one link that follows the OpenID login. So the details are specific to the subject acct:bob
.
Mastodons response:
{
"subject": "acct:xuu@chaos.social",
"aliases": [
"https://chaos.social/@xuu",
"https://chaos.social/users/xuu"
],
"links": [
{
"rel": "http://webfinger.net/rel/profile-page",
"type": "text/html",
"href": "https://chaos.social/@xuu"
},
{
"rel": "self",
"type": "application/activity+json",
"href": "https://chaos.social/users/xuu"
},
{
"rel": "http://ostatus.org/schema/1.0/subscribe"
}
]
}
it supplies a profile page and a self
which are both specific to that account.
Trying to wrap my head around webfinger..
my first thoughts about it were that a subject of acct:me@sour.is would have a listing of rel’s for the different accounts that are related to me (ie. yarn, salty, twitter, mastodon, etc…)
but maybe my thinking is at the wrong level.. that each of those accounts would be on a subject level and the rels are describing different aspects of that account. so i would have salty:acct:xuu@sour.is, twitter:acct:xuu, mastodon:acct:xuu@chaos.social, yarn:acct:xuu@ev.sour.is and then i could have a main acct:me@sour.is that links them together as aliases.
I found okta will do something similar with its accounts to show as okta:acct:user@domain so maybe I am on to something?